The following table compares the compute nodes on Vista to older nodes on Frontera, another HPC resource at TACC. Both systems are supported by the National Science Foundation, and both are intended to enable large-scale computational research in a wide variety of fields. But as mentioned, Vista is designed to be a bridge to the next leadership-class compute facility; therefore, as one might expect, its NVIDIA Grace processors have overall better individual capabilities than those in Frontera. The bigger contrast, though, comes in the sheer number of processors: size is what really what distinguishes Frontera as a leadership-class computer system. The table below emphasizes the numbers and key properties of compute nodes found in each system.

Comparison of Selected Types of Compute Nodes on Vista and Frontera.
Frontera1 Vista2
Compute Node Type Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
("Cascade Lake")
NVIDIA Grace
(ARM Neoverse v2)
Total Nodes 8,368 256
Cores/Node 56 (28 cores/socket
with 2 sockets)
144 (72 cores/processor
with 2 processors)
Hardware Threads/Core3 1 1
Clock Rate4 2.7 GHz
Max Turbo: 4.0 GHz
3.4 GHz
Memory 192 GB DDR4-2933 237 GB LPDDR5X
Peak Memory Bandwidth 282 GB/s 850 GB/s
L1 Cache 32 KB per core 64 KB per core
L2 Cache 1 MB per core 1 MB per core
L3 Cache 38.5 MB per socket 114 MB per processor
Local Storage (/tmp) 144 GB partition on
240 GB SSD
286 GB partition

1 Frontera User Guide: System Architecture
2 Vista User Guide: System Architecture
3 As of this writing, hyperthreading is not enabled on Frontera; the ARM processors on Vista are not capable of it.
4 Max Turbo applies when only 1 core is active; the Turbo Boost rate declines if more cores are active and/or AVX instructions are used.

 
©  |   Cornell University    |   Center for Advanced Computing    |   Copyright Statement    |   Access Statement
CVW material development is supported by NSF OAC awards 1854828, 2321040, 2323116 (UT Austin) and 2005506 (Indiana University)